GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

brBEESOFTvsConfigrbr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

BEESOFT
WPTR ScoreWinner1438 ms
Rank#463
TTFB1381ms
Time to 1MB108ms
Score1438
LCP1781ms
FCP1581ms
Configr
WPTR Score1468 ms
Rank#229
TTFB38ms
Time to 1MB349ms
Score1468
LCP438ms
FCP238ms

Our Verdict

Configr wins with 38ms TTFB (vs BEESOFT's 1381ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBEESOFTConfigrWinner
DNS Lookup173ms298msBEESOFT
TCP Connection442ms298msConfigr
TLS Handshake130ms19msConfigr
Server Processing434ms15msConfigr
Total TTFB1179ms630msConfigr

Technology & Security Features

BEESOFT

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size152.6 KB

Configr

Server/CDNpeqi
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size41.6 KB
0/3
BEESOFT Security Features
2/3
Configr Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.