GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

brBEESOFTvsLocawebbr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

BEESOFT
WPTR ScoreWinner1438 ms
Rank#463
TTFB1381ms
Time to 1MB108ms
Score1438
LCP1781ms
FCP1581ms
Locaweb
WPTR Score2009 ms
Rank#587
TTFB1441ms
Time to 1MB351ms
Score2009
LCP1841ms
FCP1641ms

Our Verdict

BEESOFT wins with 1381ms TTFB (vs Locaweb's 1441ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBEESOFTLocawebWinner
DNS Lookup173ms280msBEESOFT
TCP Connection442ms41msLocaweb
TLS Handshake130ms82msLocaweb
Server Processing434ms764msBEESOFT
Total TTFB1179ms1167msBEESOFT

Technology & Security Features

BEESOFT

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size152.6 KB

Locaweb

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size169.5 KB
0/3
BEESOFT Security Features
1/3
Locaweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.