BigCloudyvsE2E Networks
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

BigCloudy
View Details →
E2E Networks
View Details →Our Verdict
BigCloudy wins with 286ms TTFB (vs E2E Networks's 1447ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | BigCloudy | E2E Networks | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 63ms | 785ms | BigCloudy |
| TCP Connection | 11ms | 663ms | BigCloudy |
| TLS Handshake | 14ms | 455ms | BigCloudy |
| Server Processing | 674ms | 226ms | E2E Networks |
| Total TTFB | 762ms | 2129ms | BigCloudy |
Technology & Security Features
BigCloudy
E2E Networks
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.