GitHub|Since 2007

inBigCloudyvsHostLeloin

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score1012 ms
Rank#102
TTFB286ms
Time to 1MB104ms
Score1012
LCP686ms
FCP486ms
WPTR ScoreWinner761 ms
Rank#189
TTFB507ms
Time to 1MB102ms
Score761
LCP907ms
FCP707ms

Our Verdict

BigCloudy wins with 286ms TTFB (vs HostLelo's 507ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBigCloudyHostLeloWinner
DNS Lookup63ms68msBigCloudy
TCP Connection11ms39msBigCloudy
TLS Handshake14ms116msBigCloudy
Server Processing674ms293msHostLelo
Total TTFB762ms516msBigCloudy

Technology & Security Features

BigCloudy

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size653.2 KB

HostLelo

Server/CDNVercel
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size211.5 KB
2/3
BigCloudy Security Features
2/3
HostLelo Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.