BigCloudyvsHostNamaste
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

BigCloudy
View Details →
HostNamaste
View Details →Our Verdict
BigCloudy wins with 286ms TTFB (vs HostNamaste's 1212ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | BigCloudy | HostNamaste | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 63ms | 37ms | HostNamaste |
| TCP Connection | 11ms | 11ms | Tie |
| TLS Handshake | 14ms | 18ms | BigCloudy |
| Server Processing | 674ms | 1482ms | BigCloudy |
| Total TTFB | 762ms | 1548ms | BigCloudy |
Technology & Security Features
BigCloudy
HostNamaste
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.