GitHub|Since 2007

inBigCloudyvsHostSochin

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1012 ms
Rank#102
TTFB286ms
Time to 1MB104ms
Score1012
LCP686ms
FCP486ms
WPTR Score4473 ms
Rank#775
TTFB858ms
Time to 1MB1468ms
Score4473
LCP1258ms
FCP1058ms

Our Verdict

BigCloudy wins with 286ms TTFB (vs HostSoch's 858ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBigCloudyHostSochWinner
DNS Lookup63ms85msBigCloudy
TCP Connection11ms332msBigCloudy
TLS Handshake14ms252msBigCloudy
Server Processing674ms281msHostSoch
Total TTFB762ms950msBigCloudy

Technology & Security Features

BigCloudy

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size653.2 KB

HostSoch

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size9.2 KB
2/3
BigCloudy Security Features
0/3
HostSoch Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.