GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

AUBinary LanevsCrazy DomainsAU

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Binary Lane

Binary Lane

View Details →
WPTR Score22816 ms
Rank#900
TTFB1159ms
Time to 1MB9006ms
Score22816
LCP1559ms
FCP1359ms
Crazy Domains

Crazy Domains

View Details →
WPTR ScoreWinner3507 ms
Rank#742
TTFB115ms
Time to 1MB1366ms
Score3507
LCP515ms
FCP315ms

Our Verdict

Crazy Domains wins with 115ms TTFB (vs Binary Lane's 1159ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBinary LaneCrazy DomainsWinner
DNS Lookup82ms96msBinary Lane
TCP Connection404ms104msCrazy Domains
TLS Handshake322ms10msCrazy Domains
Server Processing394ms19msCrazy Domains
Total TTFB1202ms229msCrazy Domains

Technology & Security Features

Binary Lane

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size8.9 KB

Crazy Domains

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size9.0 KB
1/3
Binary Lane Security Features
1/3
Crazy Domains Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.