GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

seBinerovsEgensajtse

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Binero
WPTR ScoreWinner1299 ms
Rank#400
TTFB334ms
Time to 1MB415ms
Score1299
LCP734ms
FCP534ms
Egensajt
WPTR Score1351 ms
Rank#466
TTFB914ms
Time to 1MB274ms
Score1351
LCP1314ms
FCP1114ms

Our Verdict

Binero wins with 334ms TTFB (vs Egensajt's 914ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBineroEgensajtWinner
DNS Lookup109ms143msBinero
TCP Connection61ms138msBinero
TLS Handshake68ms160msBinero
Server Processing65ms252msBinero
Total TTFB303ms693msBinero

Technology & Security Features

Binero

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size361.0 KB

Egensajt

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size46.8 KB
2/3
Binero Security Features
1/3
Egensajt Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.