GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

seBinerovsInleedse

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Binero
WPTR ScoreWinner1299 ms
Rank#400
TTFB334ms
Time to 1MB415ms
Score1299
LCP734ms
FCP534ms
Inleed
WPTR Score1524 ms
Rank#395
TTFB568ms
Time to 1MB311ms
Score1524
LCP968ms
FCP768ms

Our Verdict

Binero wins with 334ms TTFB (vs Inleed's 568ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBineroInleedWinner
DNS Lookup109ms194msBinero
TCP Connection61ms263msBinero
TLS Handshake68ms59msInleed
Server Processing65ms262msBinero
Total TTFB303ms778msBinero

Technology & Security Features

Binero

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size361.0 KB

Inleed

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size496.4 KB
2/3
Binero Security Features
1/3
Inleed Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.