GitHub|Since 2007

ieBlacknightvsDigiwebie

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner723 ms
Rank#277
TTFB624ms
Time to 1MB148ms
Score723
LCP1024ms
FCP824ms
WPTR Score797 ms
Rank#115
TTFB244ms
Time to 1MB134ms
Score797
LCP644ms
FCP444ms

Our Verdict

Digiweb wins with 244ms TTFB (vs Blacknight's 624ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBlacknightDigiwebWinner
DNS Lookup62ms212msBlacknight
TCP Connection61ms19msDigiweb
TLS Handshake129ms20msDigiweb
Server Processing116ms224msBlacknight
Total TTFB368ms475msDigiweb

Technology & Security Features

Blacknight

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size83.6 KB

Digiweb

Server/CDNFlywheel/5.1.0
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size116.5 KB
1/3
Blacknight Security Features
0/3
Digiweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.