GitHub|Since 2007

brBravulinkvsHomehostbr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner574 ms
Rank#28
TTFB100ms
Time to 1MB108ms
Score574
LCP500ms
FCP300ms
WPTR Score3863 ms
Rank#788
TTFB2063ms
Time to 1MB1068ms
Score3863
LCP2463ms
FCP2263ms

Our Verdict

Bravulink wins with 100ms TTFB (vs Homehost's 2063ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBravulinkHomehostWinner
DNS Lookup84ms79msHomehost
TCP Connection15ms438msBravulink
TLS Handshake23ms497msBravulink
Server Processing193ms286msBravulink
Total TTFB315ms1300msBravulink

Technology & Security Features

Bravulink

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size219.0 KB

Homehost

Server/CDNnginx/1.21.6
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size988.2 KB
2/3
Bravulink Security Features
0/3
Homehost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.