GitHub|Since 2007

brBravulinkvsNapoleonbr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner574 ms
Rank#28
TTFB100ms
Time to 1MB108ms
Score574
LCP500ms
FCP300ms
WPTR Score2271 ms
Rank#582
TTFB702ms
Time to 1MB640ms
Score2271
LCP1102ms
FCP902ms

Our Verdict

Bravulink wins with 100ms TTFB (vs Napoleon's 702ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBravulinkNapoleonWinner
DNS Lookup84ms5msNapoleon
TCP Connection15ms246msBravulink
TLS Handshake23ms244msBravulink
Server Processing193ms240msBravulink
Total TTFB315ms735msBravulink

Technology & Security Features

Bravulink

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size219.0 KB

Napoleon

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size846.1 KB
2/3
Bravulink Security Features
1/3
Napoleon Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.