GitHub|Since 2007
WPTR

brBravulinkvsST Telemedia Global Data Centres (STT GDC)SG

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 1/11/2026

Bravulink
WPTR ScoreWinner604 ms
Rank#50
TTFB333ms
Time to 1MB113ms
Score604
LCP733ms
FCP533ms
ST Telemedia Global Data Centres (STT GDC)

ST Telemedia Global Data Centres (STT GDC)

View Details →
WPTR Score6388 ms
Rank#813
TTFB856ms
Time to 1MB2305ms
Score6388
LCP1256ms
FCP1056ms

Our Verdict

Bravulink wins with 333ms TTFB (vs ST Telemedia Global Data Centres (STT GDC)'s 856ms)

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: WPTR Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.