GitHub|Since 2007

brBravulinkvsUOL HostBR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner574 ms
Rank#28
TTFB100ms
Time to 1MB108ms
Score574
LCP500ms
FCP300ms
WPTR Score2944 ms
Rank#668
TTFB32ms
Time to 1MB1089ms
Score2944
LCP432ms
FCP232ms

Our Verdict

UOL Host wins with 32ms TTFB (vs Bravulink's 100ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBravulinkUOL HostWinner
DNS Lookup84ms236msBravulink
TCP Connection15ms38msBravulink
TLS Handshake23ms10msUOL Host
Server Processing193ms46msUOL Host
Total TTFB315ms330msUOL Host

Technology & Security Features

Bravulink

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size219.0 KB

UOL Host

Server/CDNAmazonS3
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size3.6 KB
2/3
Bravulink Security Features
1/3
UOL Host Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.