BridgeallvsRamsac
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Bridgeall
View Details →
Ramsac
View Details →Our Verdict
Bridgeall wins with 729ms TTFB (vs Ramsac's 1125ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Bridgeall | Ramsac | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 144ms | 62ms | Ramsac |
| TCP Connection | 111ms | 14ms | Ramsac |
| TLS Handshake | 71ms | 17ms | Ramsac |
| Server Processing | 422ms | 949ms | Bridgeall |
| Total TTFB | 748ms | 1042ms | Bridgeall |
Technology & Security Features
Bridgeall
Ramsac
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.