GitHub|Since 2007

SIBunny.netvsDomencasi

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner257 ms
Rank#110
TTFB325ms
Time to 1MB96ms
Score257
LCP725ms
FCP525ms
WPTR Score757 ms
Rank#229
TTFB442ms
Time to 1MB174ms
Score757
LCP842ms
FCP642ms

Our Verdict

Bunny.net wins with 325ms TTFB (vs Domenca's 442ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBunny.netDomencaWinner
DNS Lookup6ms126msBunny.net
TCP Connection13ms84msBunny.net
TLS Handshake5ms45msBunny.net
Server Processing3ms84msBunny.net
Total TTFB27ms339msBunny.net

Technology & Security Features

Bunny.net

Server/CDNBunnyCDN-TR1-942
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size786.4 KB

Domenca

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size1010.5 KB
1/3
Bunny.net Security Features
2/3
Domenca Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.