GitHub|Since 2007

SIBunny.netvsNeoservsi

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner256 ms
Rank#116
TTFB320ms
Time to 1MB99ms
Score256
LCP720ms
FCP520ms
WPTR Score1289 ms
Rank#449
TTFB836ms
Time to 1MB248ms
Score1289
LCP1236ms
FCP1036ms

Our Verdict

Bunny.net wins with 320ms TTFB (vs Neoserv's 836ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBunny.netNeoservWinner
DNS Lookup4ms16msBunny.net
TCP Connection6ms51msBunny.net
TLS Handshake5ms88msBunny.net
Server Processing3ms539msBunny.net
Total TTFB18ms694msBunny.net

Technology & Security Features

Bunny.net

Server/CDNBunnyCDN-TR1-942
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size786.4 KB

Neoserv

Server/CDNnginx/1.10.3 (Ubuntu
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size280.6 KB
1/3
Bunny.net Security Features
0/3
Neoserv Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.