GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

TRBurtinetvsKriwebtr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/26/2026

Burtinet
WPTR ScoreWinner2793 ms
Rank#651
TTFB387ms
Time to 1MB903ms
Score2793
LCP787ms
FCP587ms
Kriweb
WPTR Score3318 ms
Rank#689
TTFB375ms
Time to 1MB1050ms
Score3318
LCP775ms
FCP575ms

Our Verdict

Kriweb wins with 375ms TTFB (vs Burtinet's 387ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBurtinetKriwebWinner
DNS Lookup283ms76msKriweb
TCP Connection78ms594msBurtinet
TLS Handshake24ms10msKriweb
Server Processing241ms118msKriweb
Total TTFB626ms798msKriweb

Technology & Security Features

Burtinet

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size62.1 KB

Kriweb

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size109.0 KB
2/3
Burtinet Security Features
0/3
Kriweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.