CanSpace SolutionsvsCyderes (Herjavec Group)
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026
CanSpace Solutions
View Details →Cyderes (Herjavec Group)
View Details →Our Verdict
Cyderes (Herjavec Group) wins with 47ms TTFB (vs CanSpace Solutions's 63ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | CanSpace Solutions | Cyderes (Herjavec Group) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 7ms | 138ms | CanSpace Solutions |
| TCP Connection | 16ms | 6ms | Cyderes (Herjavec Group) |
| TLS Handshake | 20ms | 13ms | Cyderes (Herjavec Group) |
| Server Processing | 34ms | 71ms | CanSpace Solutions |
| Total TTFB | 77ms | 228ms | Cyderes (Herjavec Group) |
Technology & Security Features
CanSpace Solutions
Cyderes (Herjavec Group)
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.