GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

trCenutavsDorukNettr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Cenuta
WPTR Score1265 ms
Rank#264
TTFB327ms
Time to 1MB252ms
Score1265
LCP727ms
FCP527ms
DorukNet
WPTR ScoreWinner288 ms
Rank#2
TTFB23ms
Time to 1MB106ms
Score288
LCP423ms
FCP223ms

Our Verdict

DorukNet wins with 23ms TTFB (vs Cenuta's 327ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCenutaDorukNetWinner
DNS Lookup112ms11msDorukNet
TCP Connection50ms9msDorukNet
TLS Handshake171ms7msDorukNet
Server Processing327ms7msDorukNet
Total TTFB660ms34msDorukNet

Technology & Security Features

Cenuta

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size61.4 KB

DorukNet

Server/CDNDorukNet
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size487.1 KB
3/3
Cenuta Security Features
1/3
DorukNet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.