GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

GBChorusvsKascadeGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Chorus
WPTR Score713 ms
Rank#252
TTFB697ms
Time to 1MB107ms
Score713
LCP1097ms
FCP897ms
Kascade
WPTR ScoreWinner701 ms
Rank#71
TTFB71ms
Time to 1MB166ms
Score701
LCP471ms
FCP271ms

Our Verdict

Kascade wins with 71ms TTFB (vs Chorus's 697ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseChorusKascadeWinner
DNS Lookup206ms118msKascade
TCP Connection96ms117msChorus
TLS Handshake54ms10msKascade
Server Processing100ms58msKascade
Total TTFB456ms303msKascade

Technology & Security Features

Chorus

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size119.4 KB

Kascade

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size137.6 KB
1/3
Chorus Security Features
2/3
Kascade Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.