CloudFirevsCriticalCase
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

CloudFire
View Details →
CriticalCase
View Details →Our Verdict
CloudFire wins with 852ms TTFB (vs CriticalCase's 3950ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | CloudFire | CriticalCase | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 1ms | 43ms | CloudFire |
| TCP Connection | 4ms | 54ms | CloudFire |
| TLS Handshake | 8ms | 51ms | CloudFire |
| Server Processing | 67ms | 1927ms | CloudFire |
| Total TTFB | 80ms | 2075ms | CloudFire |
Technology & Security Features
CloudFire
CriticalCase
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.