Clouding.iovsDinahosting
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Clouding.io
View Details →
Dinahosting
View Details →Our Verdict
Clouding.io wins with 36ms TTFB (vs Dinahosting's 450ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Clouding.io | Dinahosting | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 100ms | 73ms | Dinahosting |
| TCP Connection | 4ms | 57ms | Clouding.io |
| TLS Handshake | 9ms | 56ms | Clouding.io |
| Server Processing | 88ms | 257ms | Clouding.io |
| Total TTFB | 201ms | 443ms | Clouding.io |
Technology & Security Features
Clouding.io
Dinahosting
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.