GitHub|Since 2007

idCloudKilatvsQwordsid

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner3202 ms
Rank#627
TTFB1132ms
Time to 1MB535ms
Score3202
LCP1532ms
FCP1332ms
WPTR Score8140 ms
Rank#873
TTFB6471ms
Time to 1MB2420ms
Score8140
LCP6871ms
FCP6671ms

Our Verdict

CloudKilat wins with 1132ms TTFB (vs Qwords's 6471ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCloudKilatQwordsWinner
DNS Lookup801ms380msQwords
TCP Connection201ms192msQwords
TLS Handshake378ms194msQwords
Server Processing538ms1566msCloudKilat
Total TTFB1918ms2332msCloudKilat

Technology & Security Features

CloudKilat

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size22.6 KB

Qwords

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size323.8 KB
0/3
CloudKilat Security Features
1/3
Qwords Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.