CloudnetvsOderland
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Cloudnet
View Details →
Oderland
View Details →Our Verdict
Cloudnet wins with 195ms TTFB (vs Oderland's 414ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Cloudnet | Oderland | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 8ms | 234ms | Cloudnet |
| TCP Connection | 11ms | 84ms | Cloudnet |
| TLS Handshake | 15ms | 85ms | Cloudnet |
| Server Processing | 357ms | 80ms | Oderland |
| Total TTFB | 391ms | 483ms | Cloudnet |
Technology & Security Features
Cloudnet
Oderland
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.