GitHub|Since 2007

seCloudnetvsOderlandse

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner732 ms
Rank#103
TTFB195ms
Time to 1MB142ms
Score732
LCP595ms
FCP395ms
WPTR Score1899 ms
Rank#528
TTFB414ms
Time to 1MB590ms
Score1899
LCP814ms
FCP614ms

Our Verdict

Cloudnet wins with 195ms TTFB (vs Oderland's 414ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCloudnetOderlandWinner
DNS Lookup8ms234msCloudnet
TCP Connection11ms84msCloudnet
TLS Handshake15ms85msCloudnet
Server Processing357ms80msOderland
Total TTFB391ms483msCloudnet

Technology & Security Features

Cloudnet

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size985.3 KB

Oderland

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size293.4 KB
1/3
Cloudnet Security Features
3/3
Oderland Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.