CMC TelecomvsNhân Hòa
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

CMC Telecom
View Details →
Nhân Hòa
View Details →Our Verdict
Nhân Hòa wins with 872ms TTFB (vs CMC Telecom's 2209ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | CMC Telecom | Nhân Hòa | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 2ms | 36ms | CMC Telecom |
| TCP Connection | 249ms | 15ms | Nhân Hòa |
| TLS Handshake | 253ms | 21ms | Nhân Hòa |
| Server Processing | 1023ms | 1552ms | CMC Telecom |
| Total TTFB | 1527ms | 1624ms | Nhân Hòa |
Technology & Security Features
CMC Telecom
Nhân Hòa
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.