CompugenvsWBM Technologies
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Compugen
View Details →WBM Technologies
View Details →Our Verdict
Compugen wins with 157ms TTFB (vs WBM Technologies's 848ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Compugen | WBM Technologies | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 104ms | 328ms | Compugen |
| TCP Connection | 90ms | 278ms | Compugen |
| TLS Handshake | 11ms | 148ms | Compugen |
| Server Processing | 69ms | 287ms | Compugen |
| Total TTFB | 274ms | 1041ms | Compugen |
Technology & Security Features
Compugen
WBM Technologies
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.