GitHub|Since 2007

brConfigrvsDialHostbr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1468 ms
Rank#229
TTFB38ms
Time to 1MB349ms
Score1468
LCP438ms
FCP238ms
WPTR Score2130 ms
Rank#702
TTFB2012ms
Time to 1MB411ms
Score2130
LCP2412ms
FCP2212ms

Our Verdict

Configr wins with 38ms TTFB (vs DialHost's 2012ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseConfigrDialHostWinner
DNS Lookup298ms160msDialHost
TCP Connection298ms395msConfigr
TLS Handshake19ms239msConfigr
Server Processing15ms350msConfigr
Total TTFB630ms1144msConfigr

Technology & Security Features

Configr

Server/CDNpeqi
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size41.6 KB

DialHost

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size40.2 KB
2/3
Configr Security Features
1/3
DialHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.