GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

brConfigrvsNapoleonbr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Configr
WPTR ScoreWinner1468 ms
Rank#229
TTFB38ms
Time to 1MB349ms
Score1468
LCP438ms
FCP238ms
Napoleon
WPTR Score2271 ms
Rank#582
TTFB702ms
Time to 1MB640ms
Score2271
LCP1102ms
FCP902ms

Our Verdict

Configr wins with 38ms TTFB (vs Napoleon's 702ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseConfigrNapoleonWinner
DNS Lookup298ms5msNapoleon
TCP Connection298ms246msNapoleon
TLS Handshake19ms244msConfigr
Server Processing15ms240msConfigr
Total TTFB630ms735msConfigr

Technology & Security Features

Configr

Server/CDNpeqi
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size41.6 KB

Napoleon

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size846.1 KB
2/3
Configr Security Features
1/3
Napoleon Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.