GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

JPConoHavsLolipop!JP

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

ConoHa
WPTR ScoreWinner4844 ms
Rank#666
TTFB147ms
Time to 1MB1036ms
Score4844
LCP547ms
FCP347ms
Lolipop!
WPTR Score9444 ms
Rank#860
TTFB1271ms
Time to 1MB3404ms
Score9444
LCP1671ms
FCP1471ms

Our Verdict

ConoHa wins with 147ms TTFB (vs Lolipop!'s 1271ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseConoHaLolipop!Winner
DNS Lookup1144ms279msLolipop!
TCP Connection1163ms276msLolipop!
TLS Handshake13ms290msConoHa
Server Processing38ms429msConoHa
Total TTFB2358ms1274msConoHa

Technology & Security Features

ConoHa

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size8.9 KB

Lolipop!

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size127.3 KB
0/3
ConoHa Security Features
1/3
Lolipop! Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.