GitHub|Since 2007

clCreattivavsPlanetaHostingcl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner2444 ms
Rank#599
TTFB1962ms
Time to 1MB117ms
Score2444
LCP2362ms
FCP2162ms
PlanetaHosting

PlanetaHosting

View Details
WPTR Score17266 ms
Rank#888
TTFB846ms
Time to 1MB6528ms
Score17266
LCP1246ms
FCP1046ms

Our Verdict

PlanetaHosting wins with 846ms TTFB (vs Creattiva's 1962ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCreattivaPlanetaHostingWinner
DNS Lookup249ms463msCreattiva
TCP Connection1050ms355msPlanetaHosting
TLS Handshake284ms137msPlanetaHosting
Server Processing580ms644msCreattiva
Total TTFB2163ms1599msPlanetaHosting

Technology & Security Features

Creattiva

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size104.9 KB

PlanetaHosting

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size46.2 KB
2/3
Creattiva Security Features
1/3
PlanetaHosting Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.