CretaForcevsLancom
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

CretaForce
View Details →
Lancom
View Details →Our Verdict
Lancom wins with 362ms TTFB (vs CretaForce's 469ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | CretaForce | Lancom | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 86ms | 113ms | CretaForce |
| TCP Connection | 104ms | 145ms | CretaForce |
| TLS Handshake | 65ms | 24ms | Lancom |
| Server Processing | 119ms | 281ms | CretaForce |
| Total TTFB | 374ms | 563ms | Lancom |
Technology & Security Features
CretaForce
Lancom
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.