GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

grCretaForcevsPapakigr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

CretaForce
WPTR Score614 ms
Rank#172
TTFB469ms
Time to 1MB100ms
Score614
LCP869ms
FCP669ms
Papaki
WPTR ScoreWinner565 ms
Rank#236
TTFB419ms
Time to 1MB192ms
Score565
LCP819ms
FCP619ms

Our Verdict

Papaki wins with 419ms TTFB (vs CretaForce's 469ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCretaForcePapakiWinner
DNS Lookup86ms4msPapaki
TCP Connection104ms13msPapaki
TLS Handshake65ms17msPapaki
Server Processing119ms70msPapaki
Total TTFB374ms104msPapaki

Technology & Security Features

CretaForce

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size192.2 KB

Papaki

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size114.8 KB
0/3
CretaForce Security Features
2/3
Papaki Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.