CriticalCasevsVHosting
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

CriticalCase
View Details →
VHosting
View Details →Our Verdict
VHosting wins with 146ms TTFB (vs CriticalCase's 3950ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | CriticalCase | VHosting | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 43ms | 65ms | CriticalCase |
| TCP Connection | 54ms | 12ms | VHosting |
| TLS Handshake | 51ms | 17ms | VHosting |
| Server Processing | 1927ms | 20ms | VHosting |
| Total TTFB | 2075ms | 114ms | VHosting |
Technology & Security Features
CriticalCase
VHosting
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.