GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

dkCuranetvsNetsitedk

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Curanet
WPTR ScoreWinner663 ms
Rank#82
TTFB181ms
Time to 1MB129ms
Score663
LCP581ms
FCP381ms
Netsite
WPTR Score2838 ms
Rank#711
TTFB522ms
Time to 1MB1050ms
Score2838
LCP922ms
FCP722ms

Our Verdict

Curanet wins with 181ms TTFB (vs Netsite's 522ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCuranetNetsiteWinner
DNS Lookup121ms57msNetsite
TCP Connection123ms122msNetsite
TLS Handshake10ms67msCuranet
Server Processing99ms72msNetsite
Total TTFB353ms318msCuranet

Technology & Security Features

Curanet

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size146.8 KB

Netsite

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size107.5 KB
3/3
Curanet Security Features
1/3
Netsite Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.