GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

dkCuranetvsOne.comdk

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Curanet
WPTR ScoreWinner680 ms
Rank#54
TTFB109ms
Time to 1MB138ms
Score680
LCP509ms
FCP309ms
One.com
WPTR Score1049 ms
Rank#427
TTFB776ms
Time to 1MB247ms
Score1049
LCP1176ms
FCP976ms

Our Verdict

Curanet wins with 109ms TTFB (vs One.com's 776ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCuranetOne.comWinner
DNS Lookup115ms1msOne.com
TCP Connection120ms48msOne.com
TLS Handshake10ms75msCuranet
Server Processing104ms332msCuranet
Total TTFB349ms456msCuranet

Technology & Security Features

Curanet

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size146.8 KB

One.com

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size886.5 KB
3/3
Curanet Security Features
1/3
One.com Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.