GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

roCyberfolks.rovsTHC Serversro

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Cyberfolks.ro

Cyberfolks.ro

View Details →
WPTR Score2490 ms
Rank#650
TTFB55ms
Time to 1MB1004ms
Score2490
LCP455ms
FCP255ms
THC Servers

THC Servers

View Details →
WPTR ScoreWinner648 ms
Rank#128
TTFB175ms
Time to 1MB176ms
Score648
LCP575ms
FCP375ms

Our Verdict

Cyberfolks.ro wins with 55ms TTFB (vs THC Servers's 175ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCyberfolks.roTHC ServersWinner
DNS Lookup36ms21msTHC Servers
TCP Connection11ms13msCyberfolks.ro
TLS Handshake15ms18msCyberfolks.ro
Server Processing18ms174msCyberfolks.ro
Total TTFB80ms226msCyberfolks.ro

Technology & Security Features

Cyberfolks.ro

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.3 KB

THC Servers

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size94.7 KB
2/3
Cyberfolks.ro Security Features
2/3
THC Servers Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.