GitHub|Since 2007

plCyberfolksvsHekkopl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner2394 ms
Rank#616
TTFB480ms
Time to 1MB774ms
Score2394
LCP880ms
FCP680ms
WPTR Score3026 ms
Rank#637
TTFB626ms
Time to 1MB756ms
Score3026
LCP1026ms
FCP826ms

Our Verdict

Cyberfolks wins with 480ms TTFB (vs Hekko's 626ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCyberfolksHekkoWinner
DNS Lookup44ms44msTie
TCP Connection96ms100msCyberfolks
TLS Handshake62ms62msTie
Server Processing334ms1006msCyberfolks
Total TTFB536ms1212msCyberfolks

Technology & Security Features

Cyberfolks

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size202.7 KB

Hekko

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size201.4 KB
2/3
Cyberfolks Security Features
2/3
Hekko Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.