Cyderes (Herjavec Group)vseStruxture Data Centers
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026
Cyderes (Herjavec Group)
View Details →eStruxture Data Centers
View Details →Our Verdict
Cyderes (Herjavec Group) wins with 48ms TTFB (vs eStruxture Data Centers's 56ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Cyderes (Herjavec Group) | eStruxture Data Centers | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 338ms | 102ms | eStruxture Data Centers |
| TCP Connection | 5ms | 6ms | Cyderes (Herjavec Group) |
| TLS Handshake | 9ms | 12ms | Cyderes (Herjavec Group) |
| Server Processing | 77ms | 145ms | Cyderes (Herjavec Group) |
| Total TTFB | 429ms | 265ms | Cyderes (Herjavec Group) |
Technology & Security Features
Cyderes (Herjavec Group)
eStruxture Data Centers
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.