GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

dkDanDomainvsScanNetdk

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

DanDomain
WPTR ScoreWinner614 ms
Rank#111
TTFB315ms
Time to 1MB101ms
Score614
LCP715ms
FCP515ms
ScanNet
WPTR Score896 ms
Rank#368
TTFB638ms
Time to 1MB239ms
Score896
LCP1038ms
FCP838ms

Our Verdict

DanDomain wins with 315ms TTFB (vs ScanNet's 638ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDanDomainScanNetWinner
DNS Lookup110ms65msScanNet
TCP Connection69ms124msDanDomain
TLS Handshake68ms67msScanNet
Server Processing125ms66msScanNet
Total TTFB372ms322msDanDomain

Technology & Security Features

DanDomain

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size225.2 KB

ScanNet

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size43.6 KB
1/3
DanDomain Security Features
1/3
ScanNet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.