GitHub|Since 2007
WPTR

fiData Center FinlandvsInternexat

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 1/12/2026

Data Center Finland

Data Center Finland

View Details →
WPTR ScoreWinner951 ms
Rank#239
TTFB668ms
Time to 1MB118ms
Score951
LCP1068ms
FCP868ms
Internex
WPTR Score1718 ms
Rank#521
TTFB230ms
Time to 1MB620ms
Score1718
LCP630ms
FCP430ms

Our Verdict

Internex wins with 230ms TTFB (vs Data Center Finland's 668ms)

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: WPTR Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.