GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

beDazzlevsNomeobe

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Dazzle
WPTR ScoreWinner1227 ms
Rank#465
TTFB626ms
Time to 1MB427ms
Score1227
LCP1026ms
FCP826ms
Nomeo
WPTR Score1897 ms
Rank#518
TTFB256ms
Time to 1MB678ms
Score1897
LCP656ms
FCP456ms

Our Verdict

Nomeo wins with 256ms TTFB (vs Dazzle's 626ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDazzleNomeoWinner
DNS Lookup111ms213msDazzle
TCP Connection4ms14msDazzle
TLS Handshake8ms22msDazzle
Server Processing79ms21msNomeo
Total TTFB202ms270msNomeo

Technology & Security Features

Dazzle

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size31.5 KB

Nomeo

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.4 KB
2/3
Dazzle Security Features
3/3
Nomeo Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.