GitHub|Since 2007

esDesafío HostingvsDinahostinges

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Desafío Hosting

Desafío Hosting

View Details
WPTR Score6884 ms
Rank#858
TTFB2823ms
Time to 1MB2572ms
Score6884
LCP3223ms
FCP3023ms
Dinahosting

Dinahosting

View Details
WPTR ScoreWinner733 ms
Rank#181
TTFB450ms
Time to 1MB121ms
Score733
LCP850ms
FCP650ms

Our Verdict

Dinahosting wins with 450ms TTFB (vs Desafío Hosting's 2823ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDesafío HostingDinahostingWinner
DNS Lookup5ms73msDesafío Hosting
TCP Connection179ms57msDinahosting
TLS Handshake177ms56msDinahosting
Server Processing350ms257msDinahosting
Total TTFB711ms443msDinahosting

Technology & Security Features

Desafío Hosting

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size115.3 KB

Dinahosting

Server/CDNHTTPd
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size0.3 KB
0/3
Desafío Hosting Security Features
1/3
Dinahosting Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.