GitHub|Since 2007

brDialHostvsGiganetbr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner2130 ms
Rank#702
TTFB2012ms
Time to 1MB411ms
Score2130
LCP2412ms
FCP2212ms
WPTR Score6328 ms
Rank#824
TTFB670ms
Time to 1MB2338ms
Score6328
LCP1070ms
FCP870ms

Our Verdict

Giganet wins with 670ms TTFB (vs DialHost's 2012ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDialHostGiganetWinner
DNS Lookup160ms72msGiganet
TCP Connection395ms35msGiganet
TLS Handshake239ms254msDialHost
Server Processing350ms356msDialHost
Total TTFB1144ms717msGiganet

Technology & Security Features

DialHost

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size40.2 KB

Giganet

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size8.7 KB
1/3
DialHost Security Features
0/3
Giganet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.