GitHub|Since 2007

brDialHostvsHostMídiabr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score2130 ms
Rank#702
TTFB2012ms
Time to 1MB411ms
Score2130
LCP2412ms
FCP2212ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1678 ms
Rank#455
TTFB769ms
Time to 1MB351ms
Score1678
LCP1169ms
FCP969ms

Our Verdict

HostMídia wins with 769ms TTFB (vs DialHost's 2012ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDialHostHostMídiaWinner
DNS Lookup160ms122msHostMídia
TCP Connection395ms76msHostMídia
TLS Handshake239ms24msHostMídia
Server Processing350ms614msDialHost
Total TTFB1144ms836msHostMídia

Technology & Security Features

DialHost

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size40.2 KB

HostMídia

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size41.3 KB
1/3
DialHost Security Features
3/3
HostMídia Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.