GitHub|Since 2007

brDialHostvsLocawebbr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1746 ms
Rank#649
TTFB1680ms
Time to 1MB306ms
Score1746
LCP2080ms
FCP1880ms
WPTR Score3280 ms
Rank#757
TTFB2762ms
Time to 1MB305ms
Score3280
LCP3162ms
FCP2962ms

Our Verdict

DialHost wins with 1680ms TTFB (vs Locaweb's 2762ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDialHostLocawebWinner
DNS Lookup197ms1542msDialHost
TCP Connection235ms70msLocaweb
TLS Handshake238ms89msLocaweb
Server Processing342ms847msDialHost
Total TTFB1012ms2548msDialHost

Technology & Security Features

DialHost

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size40.2 KB

Locaweb

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size169.5 KB
1/3
DialHost Security Features
1/3
Locaweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.