DinahostingvsGuebs
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Dinahosting
View Details →
Guebs
View Details →Our Verdict
Dinahosting wins with 450ms TTFB (vs Guebs's 1476ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Dinahosting | Guebs | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 73ms | 157ms | Dinahosting |
| TCP Connection | 57ms | 229ms | Dinahosting |
| TLS Handshake | 56ms | 137ms | Dinahosting |
| Server Processing | 257ms | 352ms | Dinahosting |
| Total TTFB | 443ms | 875ms | Dinahosting |
Technology & Security Features
Dinahosting
Guebs
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.