GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

grDNHOSTvsIP.GRgr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

DNHOST
WPTR ScoreWinner2017 ms
Rank#377
TTFB909ms
Time to 1MB135ms
Score2017
LCP1309ms
FCP1109ms
IP.GR
WPTR Score2502 ms
Rank#649
TTFB52ms
Time to 1MB1005ms
Score2502
LCP452ms
FCP252ms

Our Verdict

IP.GR wins with 52ms TTFB (vs DNHOST's 909ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDNHOSTIP.GRWinner
DNS Lookup233ms19msIP.GR
TCP Connection53ms16msIP.GR
TLS Handshake106ms16msIP.GR
Server Processing1301ms39msIP.GR
Total TTFB1693ms90msIP.GR

Technology & Security Features

DNHOST

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size90.9 KB

IP.GR

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.2 KB
0/3
DNHOST Security Features
3/3
IP.GR Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.