GitHub|Since 2007

inDomainRacervsHello2Hostingin

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

DomainRacer

DomainRacer

View Details
WPTR Score10069 ms
Rank#867
TTFB961ms
Time to 1MB3979ms
Score10069
LCP1361ms
FCP1161ms
Hello2Hosting

Hello2Hosting

View Details
WPTR ScoreWinner7042 ms
Rank#825
TTFB2918ms
Time to 1MB1511ms
Score7042
LCP3318ms
FCP3118ms

Our Verdict

DomainRacer wins with 961ms TTFB (vs Hello2Hosting's 2918ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDomainRacerHello2HostingWinner
DNS Lookup19ms484msDomainRacer
TCP Connection167ms1823msDomainRacer
TLS Handshake164ms365msDomainRacer
Server Processing169ms744msDomainRacer
Total TTFB519ms3416msDomainRacer

Technology & Security Features

DomainRacer

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size72.4 KB

Hello2Hosting

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size264.5 KB
2/3
DomainRacer Security Features
0/3
Hello2Hosting Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.