GitHub|Since 2007

siDomencavsNeoservsi

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner757 ms
Rank#229
TTFB442ms
Time to 1MB174ms
Score757
LCP842ms
FCP642ms
WPTR Score1345 ms
Rank#452
TTFB875ms
Time to 1MB267ms
Score1345
LCP1275ms
FCP1075ms

Our Verdict

Domenca wins with 442ms TTFB (vs Neoserv's 875ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDomencaNeoservWinner
DNS Lookup126ms12msNeoserv
TCP Connection84ms49msNeoserv
TLS Handshake45ms89msDomenca
Server Processing84ms554msDomenca
Total TTFB339ms704msDomenca

Technology & Security Features

Domenca

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size1010.5 KB

Neoserv

Server/CDNnginx/1.10.3 (Ubuntu
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size280.6 KB
2/3
Domenca Security Features
0/3
Neoserv Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.